Legislation Details

File #: 22-00216    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Quasi-Judicial Hearing Status: Passed
File created: 2/23/2022 In control: City Council Special Meeting
On agenda: 3/2/2022 Final action: 3/2/2022
Enactment date: Enactment #:
Title: REVIEW OF A DECISION RENDERED BY THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD CONCERNING 43 SOUTH PALAFOX PLACE, REQUEST FOR DEMOLITION OF A CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE.
Sponsors: Ann Hill
Attachments: 1. 12-16-21 ARB minutes, 2. 12.16.2021 - 43 South Palafox St. PowerPoint, 3. 43 S. Palafox Place - Staff Memo, 4. Complete Packet - 43 S. Palafox Place, 5. Hand-Out at Meeting from UWF Historic Trust Advisor, 6. Notice of Appeal - 43 S. Palafox Place, 7. ARB Appeal Presentation by Kramer Litvak 2022.03.02, 8. Demolition of Contributing Structures Process, 9. Sec. 12-3-10. - Historic and preservation land use district, 10. Sec. 12-3-27. - Palafox historic business district, 11. PROOF OF PUBLICATION NOTICE OF QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARING

LEGISLATIVE ACTION ITEM

 

SPONSOR:                     City Council President Ann Hill

 

SUBJECT:

 

title                     

REVIEW OF A DECISION RENDERED BY THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD CONCERNING 43 SOUTH PALAFOX PLACE, REQUEST FOR DEMOLITION OF A CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE.                     

end                       

 

RECOMMENDATION:

 

recommendation

That City Council conduct a quasi-judicial hearing on March 2, 2022 for the purpose of reviewing a decision made by the Architectural Review Board concerning a request for Demolition of a Contributing Structure at 43 South Palafox Place.  Further that City Council either, confirm the Architectural Review Board decision, reverse the Architectural Review Board decision or send it back to the Architectural Review Board for further action.

end

body                                                             

 

HEARING REQUIRED:    Quasi-Judicial      

 

SUMMARY:

 

On December 16, 2021, the Architectural Review Board (ARB) considered a request for approval for the Demolition of a Contributing Structure at 43 South Palafox Place.

 

After presentation by the applicant and discussion by the board, a properly made motion to deny the request was made and seconded with a resulting vote of 6-0 to deny, with one board member absent.

 

 Sec. 12-12-3(13) of the City Code which states:

 

                     “Any person or entity whose property interests are substantially affected by a decision of the board may within fifteen (15) days thereafter, apply to the city council for review of the board’s decision. A written notice shall be filed with the city clerk requesting the council to review said decision. If the applicant obtains a building permit within the fifteen-day time period specified for review of a board decision, said permit may be subject to revocation and any work undertaken in accordance with said permit may be required to be removed. The appellant shall be required to pay an application fee according to the current schedule of fees established by the city council for the particular category of application. This fee shall be nonrefundable irrespective of the final disposition of the application.”

 

In accordance with Sec. 12-12-3(13) a notice of appeal was timely filed.

 

Particulars of the ARB discussion and item can be found in the attachments to this item.

 

 

 

PRIOR ACTION:                     

 

12-16-2021 - Architectural Review Board Meeting regarding this request

 

12-22-21 - Notice of Appeal - 43 S. Palafox Place - timely filed

 

FUNDING:                     

 

N/A

 

 

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

                     

None

 

STAFF CONTACT:

 

Don Kraher, Council Executive

 

ATTACHMENTS:

 

1)                     12-16-21 ARB minutes

2)                     12.16.2021 43 South Palafox St. PowerPoint

3)                     43 S. Palafox Place - Staff Memo

4)                     Complete Packet - 43 S. Palafox Place

5)                     Hand-Out at Meeting from UWF Historic Trust Advisor

6)                     Notice of Appeal - 43 S. Palafox Place

 

PRESENTATION:     No