City of Pensacola Logo
 
File #: 17-00591    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Public Hearing Status: Passed
File created: 10/16/2017 In control: City Council
On agenda: 11/9/2017 Final action: 11/9/2017
Enactment date: Enactment #:
Title: PUBLIC HEARING - AMENDMENT TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 12-2-21 PALAFOX HISTORIC BUSINESS DISTRICT
Sponsors: Brian Spencer
Attachments: 1. Proposed Ordinance, 2. Planning Board Minutes 9.12.17, 3. PROOF OF PUBLICATION PROPOSED LDC AMEND SEC. 12.2.21

LEGISLATIVE ACTION ITEM

 

SPONSOR:                     City Council President Brian Spencer

 

SUBJECT:

 

title                     

PUBLIC HEARING - AMENDMENT TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 12-2-21 PALAFOX HISTORIC BUSINESS DISTRICT                     

end                       

 

RECOMMENDATION:

 

recommendation

That City Council hold a public hearing to consider an amendment to the Land Development Code (LDC) Section 12-2-21 (F)(4)(a) prohibiting internally illuminated signs in the Palafox Historic Business District (PHBD).

end

body                                                             

 

HEARING REQUIRED:    Public      

 

SUMMARY:

 

Currently, Land Development Code Section 12-2-21 Palafox Historic Business District does not specifically address the issue of internal illumination.

 

At the September 12, 2017 meeting of the Planning Board, the Board, at Council’s request, reviewed Section 12-2-21(F)(4) (a) - Signs.  The Board considered a possible amendment to the LDC addressing the issue of internal illumination of signs within the PHBD.

 

Recently, on two separate occasions, the Architectural Review Board (ARB) has interpreted the Code to authorize the denial of internally illuminated signs within the PHBD.  On appeal, the City Council has reversed the ARB on this issue, speaking to the lack of direction or specific prohibition within the Code, noting that within the Pensacola Historic District there exists a prohibition of such signage that is lacking within the PHBD.

 

Board member Monk stated that he was concerned with the continued compromise of the ordinance, stating that you either want bright lights or preservation of the historic aesthetic.  Board Chairman Ritz advised that if the Board stated internally illuminated signs shall be prohibited, that would answer the problem and the ARB could then enforce the rule in the district.  Further stating, that such language would give the ARB a position from which to rule.

 

Board member Grundhoefer explained that the ARB was attempting to maintain and preserve the integrity and history of the city, and if the Planning Board also has that as a mantra, then the Board should be proud to take that on as well.

 

A motion was made to prohibit internally illuminated signs within the PHBD.  This motion passed unanimously.

 

PRIOR ACTION:                     

 

August 10, 2017 - City Council forwards Internal Illumination issue within the PHBD to the Planning Board for review and recommendation.

 

FUNDING:                     

 

N/A

 

 

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

                     

None                     

 

STAFF CONTACT:

 

Don Kraher, Council Executive

 

ATTACHMENTS:

 

1)                     Proposed Ordinance

2)                     Planning Board Minutes 9.12.17

 

PRESENTATION:     No